Sec. 172.015. SUBROGATION; ADEQUATE RECOVERY  


Latest version.
  • (a) In this section, "covered individual" means a person who is covered by the pool. The term includes an official, an employee, a retiree, and an employee of an affiliated service contractor and their dependents.

    (b) The payor of employee benefits, whether a political subdivision, group of political subdivisions, pool, or carrier providing reinsurance to one of those entities, is subrogated to a covered individual's right of recovery for personal injuries caused by the tortious conduct of a third party.

    (c) A payor of employee benefits whose interest is not actively represented by an attorney in a third-party action shall pay to an attorney representing the covered individual a fee in an amount determined under an agreement entered into between the attorney and the payor of employee benefits. Except as provided by Subsection (i), in the absence of an agreement, the court shall award to the attorney, payable out of the recovery of the payor of employee benefits, a reasonable fee for recovery of the interest of the payor of employee benefits, not to exceed one-third of the payor's recovery.

    (d) If the injured covered individual is not able to realize a complete and adequate recovery for injuries sustained as a result of the actionable fault of a third party, the payor of employee benefits is entitled to a pro rata recovery described by Subsection (e). A common law doctrine that requires that an injured party be made whole before a subrogee makes a recovery does not apply to the recovery of the payor of employee benefits under this subsection.

    (e) Unless otherwise agreed by a covered individual and the payor of employee benefits and subject to Subsection (f), the payor's pro rata share under Subsection (d) is an amount that is equal to the lesser of:

    (1) one-third of the covered individual's total recovery; or

    (2) the total cost of employee benefits paid by the payor as a direct result of the tortious conduct of the third party.

    (f) A covered individual may bring an action for declaratory judgment to establish that the amount of the pro rata recovery to which the payor of employee benefits is entitled is an amount that is less than the pro rata share described by Subsection (e). To prevail in an action brought under this subsection, the covered individual must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount of the covered individual's total recovery is less than 50 percent of the value of the covered person's underlying claim for damages.

    (g) Except as otherwise provided by this subsection, the court shall establish the payor's pro rata recovery under Subsection (f) in an amount that is not less than 15 percent of and not more than one-third of the covered individual's total recovery. If a covered individual shows by clear and convincing evidence that the pro rata share otherwise described by this subsection would result in manifest injustice, the court shall establish the payor's pro rata recovery in an amount that is less than 15 percent of and equal to or greater than five percent of the covered individual's total recovery.

    (h) Notwithstanding Chapter 37, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, or any other law, in an action brought under Subsection (f) the court may not award costs or attorney's fees to any party in the action.

    (i) Notwithstanding Subsection (c), a payor of employee benefits may not be assessed out of the recovery to which the payor is entitled under Subsection (e) or (f) any attorney's fees under any theory or rule of law, including the common fund doctrine.

    (j) Subsections (c)-(i) do not apply to a payor of employee benefits participating in a cooperative effort to design and administer benefits through an administrative agency that includes a cooperative member that is a county with a population of at least two million that is adjacent to a county with a population of at least one million.

Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1067, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1989. Amended by: Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1379 , Sec. 1, eff. June 15, 2007.